WikiSysop at 09:41, 17 July 2017

2017-07-17T09:41:21Z

WikiSysop: Created page with "'''LaserDisc - the state of the art''' By Ryan Holtz, as posted on "The Dumping Union" private mailing list on 10th July, 2017 --- THE GAMES & THEIR DATA --- The vast majori..."

2017-07-17T09:37:03Z

Created page with "'''LaserDisc - the state of the art''' By Ryan Holtz, as posted on "The Dumping Union" private mailing list on 10th July, 2017 --- THE GAMES & THEIR DATA --- The vast majori..."

New page

'''LaserDisc - the state of the art'''
By Ryan Holtz, as posted on "The Dumping Union" private mailing list on 10th July, 2017

--- THE GAMES & THEIR DATA ---

The vast majority of LD games were not as simple as having the LD
player operating as a dumb playback mechanism, receiving commands
one-way from the arcade board. LD games used a variety of methods for
encoding data onto the disc and then retrieving the data in such a
fashion that the game can use it. In some cases, this data was encoded
into one of the audio tracks (I believe). If I recall correctly,
M.A.C.H. 3 and Us vs. Them used that, and in fact it's why the games
eventually die in MAME due to a data error. I seem to recall that
someone has gone to the effort to remaster the audio tracks and
re-inject them into the CHD so that those two games are fully
playable, but since the data was never sent directly to a MAME dev and
was simply hosted on some obscure site, that fixed data may have since
been lost. I'm not sure.

Other games - the majority of them, as I understand it - make use of
the fact that while there are well-defined broadcast standards for
splicing auxiliary digital data into certain "lines" beyond the normal
visible area of a given video field - in fact, this is how things like
subtitles and other information were encoded, for years - there are
some lines that never ended up being used. It is there that these LD
games can and do store various data there, things like frame indices,
and other things.

To that end, in order to capture a Laserdisc in the one format that's
currently accepted by MAME, "all" you need to do is find some sort of
capture card that lets you capture the full frame, rather than one
which crops the output to the normally-visible area of the signal.
This is easier said than done, obviously, but I imagine that it
wouldn't be too difficult for someone savvy with pro-grade (as opposed
to consumer-grade) hardware to make short work of.

--- THE CONTAINER FORMAT ---

MAME currently only supports using uncompressed AVI as the container
format that gets turned into a CHD for a couple of reasons, and I'll
outline them here:

1A. As a project focused mainly on documentation, all data in MAME is
*supposed* to be able to be "round-tripped". A CHD of a hard drive can
be uncompressed and then dd'd back onto a real drive, and it should
work just as well as the original drive. You can turn right around and
burn just about any ROM in MAME back to an actual chip and use it on
real hardware, and you could conceivably then stick that ROM back in a
ROM reader and wind up with a file that has identical contents to the
file. While that standard is definitely NOT yet the case for all
optical media, it is for the vast majority of the ones that we
currently support, and we would absolutely not say 'no' to anyone who
was willing to add support for copy-protected optical media that would
allow CHDMAN to output a standard mastering image that could be
shipped off to a place like Philips and pressed onto an actual disc.

1B. Thus we turn to Laserdiscs: Uncompressed AVI is really the only
way to go here, barring certain relatively obscure lossless formats
that, for reasons associated with licensing (more on that in point
#2), have not been available to MAME up until very recently. With
lossy compression, the concept of "generational loss" is a very real
thing, and very insidious. After a sufficient number of trips through
the system, you could wind up with an image that's lossy enough to
stop working in an actual machine or in MAME, but it's entirely random
as to how many trips that could be. Therefore, we go with uncompressed
AVI.

2. Until recently, MAME has not been able to use libraries that are
licensed under the GNU Public License (GPL). Now, at least, we can use
GPLv2-licensed code, but if I recall correctly, not GPLv3-licensed
code. So this does in fact open up some new options for lossless
codecs that we have not yet explored, but it's something that - if we
can come up with a way of dumping Laserdiscs again - MAME devs would
likely be quite interested in looking into.

--- THE HARDWARE NITTY-GRITTY (what I'm sure some of you are looking for) ---

Other than the above-mentioned option of finding capture hardware that
will also capture the VBI data, there has been a lot of talk about
more accurate ways of dumping, which cut a capture card out of the
equation, and could result in vastly better dumps than anything
anyone's ever seen before. However, it would absolutely require the
support of one or more experienced hardware persons who are as
passionate about preserving LD games as we are about emulating them
(no, really!). I figure the DU is probably the best bet for putting
out a call for help in that regard, given the amazing things you all
have done with hardware reverse-engineering, so I'm kind of shocked on
behalf of the MAME team that nobody has done so yet. Again, this is a
situation where there are various options on the table, all with their
own trade-offs of quality versus ease of implementation. I'll get into
them in a second, but let me give some background information on
Laserdisc itself.

Laserdisc, all other things being equal, is very much an analog format
and not digital. It might be optical media, but it has far more in
common with RCA's "CED" (Capacitance Electronic Disc) system, which
incidentally was *also* used for a very small number of arcade games
that wanted to incorporate video. Rather than the pattern of "pits"
and "lands" on the disc being translated directly into digital data,
it is the *lengths* of these pits and lands that encodes the actual
signal. Hand-waving away certain details that I'm not confident enough
to speak on, it effectively encodes into analog media the analog
signal of the video itself, at roughly the same bandwidth as broadcast
NTSC or PAL video (roughly 6MHz).

Having clarified that, here are the options that I'm aware of:

1. Some MAME developers, myself included, have heard rumors of a
specific model of LD player, late in the life-cycle of the LD medium
itself, which helpfully has a digital signal fairly close to the laser
pickup which indicates whether or not a given sample is "good" or not.
This would obviously be the ultimate ideal player around which to
design dumping hardware, because it means being able to come up with a
bit-perfect dump by repeatedly re-reading one or more examples of the
same disc, which would presumably have different areas of the disc
affected by bit-rot. And make no mistake, there's probably not an LD
in existence right now that doesn't have at least *some* amount of
bit-rot.

This would effectively require tracking down a Laserdisc player with
the relevant capabilities, and designing custom hardware to tap
directly into the signals on the laser pickup directly after it's been
sampled by the ADC and the good/no-good bit has been set or unset.

2+. Other MAME developers, and contributors, have theorized that it
should be possible to take an earlier model of LD player and sample
the output signal directly, at various points in the process - just
off the laser pickup, just before the carrier is taken out and any
signal clean-up is done, just after any signal clean-up is done, or
worst-case, directly before any kind of RF modulation. Each of these
is considered less desirable than solution #1, as they naturally all
involve some measure of signal degradation simply by passing through
more circuitry before we can get at it. Along with solution #1, they
share one major issue, which is finding someone who is both able and
willing to design a rig - most likely one-off, but possibly turnkey -
that can actually *do* this, *and* who has the necessary logic
analyzer with sufficient bandwidth and sufficient bit-width to
actually capture data at a workable level of quality.

This, too, would require tracking down a Laserdisc player with a
circuitry design or capabilities that make it easier to do so, and
also involves designing custom hardware to tap directly into the
signals *somewhere* in the player.

--- THE CONCLUSION ---

At the end of the day, this isn't something that can be done solo, or
even by only a couple of people. Even Aaron's work required the
assistance of someone on the hardware end of things, and someone
willing to come up with custom drivers for his preferred video capture
card. It's not even something that can be done just by hardware
people, or just by software people. But *especially* not just by
software people.

Given that Daphne already has a huge amount of mind-share among users,
and the fact that it already uses the interim solution that you
propose, Ed - frame files - I hope you can all understand a little bit
better why there is no interest among MAME developers to trudge down
an already-beaten path that will ultimately be "good enough" for the
majority of users. We want something that results in an objectively
superior solution in MAME. We already fail to meet the self-stated bar
of quality in terms of serving as documentation, rather than free
games, and I don't think it's unreasonable for us to want to hold
ourselves to a high standard when and where we can.

The argument that we can come up with something that's good enough
"for now" is objectively wrong: The fact is, we're having a hard
enough time finding people who share the same vision as us, and who
are willing to help bring up the hardware side of things while we take
care of the software side of things. It beggars belief that anyone
would think that that situation would somehow become *better* by just
giving in and saying "Screw it, let's go with MPEG rips". That we
haven't done so yet is *exactly* why we're currently having this
discussion right now, and I hope that this extremely long e-mail has
helped to illuminate many of the concerns that we have about going
with a less-than-ideal solution, has helped to illustrate the
technical challenges that are involved in accurately dumping
Laserdiscs, and, with my last bit of hope, I hope that it will inspire
some - any - of you who are hardware-inclined to help us in realizing
this goal.

Mog out.

[[Category:Tutorials]]

LaserDisc - the state of the art - Revision history

WikiSysop at 09:41, 17 July 2017

WikiSysop: Created page with "'''LaserDisc - the state of the art''' By Ryan Holtz, as posted on "The Dumping Union" private mailing list on 10th July, 2017 --- THE GAMES & THEIR DATA --- The vast majori..."